Dear blogger!
Today we had a conversation at the course I’m attending at Stockholms University called giicod. We talked about the definition of a friend in reality vs a friend in social networking like Facebook, Myspace etc.. We also talked about the posibility, that the way we define friends in social networking will change our world and the way we think of relations in general.
In real life we make a distinction between friends, family, acquaintances, colleagues etc. In social networks there is just one single definition : Friends.
I got this comment from ‘LOmiG’on my first blogpost about virtual relations :
”I think the virtual relation is not a virtual relation : you meet people on blogs that are interested in the same matter than you, and you do just the same as in real life. You exchange thoughts, feelings, and time. To my mind, it’s like beeing in a sport club…without leaving your home.”
I think ‘LomiG’ has a point in his way of seeing virtual relations as a kind of reflection to relations in reality, but I also think there are differences.
I think that the way we meet in our virtual life has other patterns than the way we meet in reality. The impression of a person I meet for the first time in reality would often have more to do with personal appearance and social behaviour and less about the persons thoughts and feelings. A deeper insight of a person would often come in another face of the relation – when you’ve become ’real’ friends. In the virtual reality the relation is build up by another pattern and has other definitions. An example of this can be that if I’m at a concert with f.ex. Tom Waits, I wouldn’t consider him as my friend, but at the same time you can go to my myspace-site and see Tom Waits figure in my topfriend-list. That is because i like Tom Waits’music and use his music as an inspiration to my own music. But does that make Tom Waits my friend?
Another example is the way we relate to eachother on blogs and exchange our thoughts and feelings to anyone who reads the blog. Would we be ready to exchange our thoughts and feelings with a person on the street who accidentally passed by?
A little music pause…………..
I googled on the theme ‘relations on internet’ and found this blog. The writer of the blog is dealing with the same kind of questions and themes like we do at giicod. Among other things she’s writing about a thing called Anti-social networking that is some kind of a reaction to the ‘friendly’ social networking.
In physics and philosophy, a relational theory is a framework to understand reality or a physical system in such a way that the position and other properties of the objects are only meaningful relative to other objects.
Does it work in the same way in the blogospere? Are blogs only meaningful relative to other blogs. When we read someone’s blog, do we relate to the writer of the blog in the same way, than when we read a book or an article in a paper – or is it different?
Now that you’ve read this long post in my blog (if you’ve made it this far!) … in what way do you relate to me? If you should be inspired of my thoughts and even leave a comment, how would you define our relation:
Are we friends? – What do you think??





5 comments
Comments feed for this article
December 7, 2007 at 6:38 am
lomig
hi,
very intersting post…! Keep writing…
An interesting difference between real life and virtual life, is about communication.
Communication between two persons involve about 80% of non-verbal communication (behaviour, looks, gestures, tone of voice, and so on) and 20% verbal.
In real life, the communication is very much influenced by the non-verbal part. On the net, and virtual stuff, you get only the verbal part.
So i would define the virual relationship as a very “intellectual” one, based on ideas more than feelings.
Your friend, not virtual, but intellectual
December 7, 2007 at 5:55 pm
rgatarski
I appreciate the (long and interesting) reflections you make, but will not comment them as I still want you and your classmates to form and cultivate your exploration(s).
December 9, 2007 at 1:22 pm
Julie
Hi!
I think friends in real life is easier to understand because you can see them and connect the non-verbal language to the verbal. But I think it is easier to write a comment like this to a virtual friend like you. I dont have to think about how I put down the words because it is a superficial relationship. I don’t have to hold back. When that is said I have experienced that some people in the virtual reality takes what you say for granted, and can react on it as if it’s connected to reality. For instance you can talk casual with a so called friend in virtuality and after a while deside to connect in real life. In that way you actually make new friends but it can turn out bad if you don’t agree on the relationship. So you should take care of who you connect to – but that’s on the other hand the same risk you take in real life?
December 10, 2007 at 7:34 am
Susanne LIndahl
Hi Karen!
wrong, wrong, wrong…….. an intellectual one. And I know you are a nice intellectual one, and I hope I am the same….. Now I’m going to giicod to meet my classmates irl….
Yes! At last we have started something….. a virtual relationship
ciao bella
December 21, 2007 at 2:39 pm
Richard Gatarski
Well, I must say that the good thing with the non-Internet mediated part of the world is that it is not filled with “junk” (note, irony).